Is dreamcast more powerful than ps2 reddit. Then Sega decided to get creative.

It's not fair to lump Dreamcast with PS2 saying "well they are all 6th gen consoles, so to talk Dreamcast let's compare PS2 games to now instead of Dreamcast games to now. The PS2 catalog has lots of games that remained exclusive or weren't ported to Android or easier to emulate devices like the GameCube, Wii, PSP or Dreamcast. On the flip side of that the SNES excelled with digital sample playback and thus could produce clearer more realistic pre-recorded sounds than the Sega. iirc the game has real bad load times on UMD. But back then it was underrated, it deserved more success. Boy do I suck at figuring out console wars. The PS2 was simply a more powerful console. The 3+ and Flip share the same 16:9 1334x750 4. If you like fighting games, this is the console. It may have even come out around the same time since the power disparity between the Dreamcast and the other 6th gen systems is significant. This reboot of the classic side-scrolling action series was a gorgeous showcase of the Xbox's graphics. Street Fighter Alpha 3. Naomi 2 is a much more powerful system than the dreamcast. I appreciate my Odin for what it does well. ummm, the 280v doesn't have wifi either. Of course, my retro mentality also leads me to perceive as awesome some incredibly programmed games for 8 bit, 16 bit and 32/64 bit systems, but it's with the Dreamcast-era (I would use PS2 era, but this subreddit only includes Dreamcast as retro) that my mind still perceives the whole thing as "futuristic" and "super advanced". I’d compare the psp to a PS1 tbh. It has very unique titles, most published by Sega and / or Sonic Team. My point was that performance isn't everything. Ninja Gaiden is also remembered for its grueling difficulty, testing the patience of even the most skilled gamers. They wouldn't have. The Xbox was decidedly more powerful than the gcn and ps2 and the GCN wasn't that far behind. The Pi4 on paper is more powerful than a PS2. bigace33 said: lol no. This thing is more powerful than a PSP, DS, Dreamcast, PS1, PS2, Xbox 1 etc. The other 3 handhelds have the T618 chip, which is slightly more powerful. Sony PlayStation 2. And most importantly. Just about everyone who got a dreamcast got a console that was pretty impressive and innovative for its time and that had a small but fun and unique Better looking than psp games. The notion that they made a decision to abandon consoles and that's why dreamcast failed is fallacious. 3DS is very slightly stronger than a PS2 iirc. The problem with the PS2 it doesnt clean up well on a modern TV, like the gamecube and original Xbox does. I noticed there's a core for that now. PS2 games from 2005 don't even look as good as DC games from 2000. I know this because I played the game on both consoles, and PS2 was much better than the GameCube version. Its about a ps 1. You can play some mario64 port . The fact that the PS2, a console that would be more powerful than the dreamcast and have a DVD player (a rarity at the time), was right around the corner pretty much sealed the orange swirl's fate. It's more powerful than a psp. That said, Dreamcast for life. All that being said. go to tcrf. The only way more RAM would see a speed increase is if you're running something that has to keep loading and unloading assets. In retrospect, the arcade style games are also why I go back to the Dreamcast FAR more than PS2 or other consoles. Naomi 2’s about 4 times more powerful than DC, it pushes a loooooot more tri’s, more powerful than PS2 as well, it’s a bit more in line with Xbox and GC. The CPU, being a 733 MHz Pentium III, is miles ahead of the 294 MHz MIPS core in the PS2. PS is easier to emulate than Saturn. Sony PlayStation. PSN: Brian_2030, Xbox Live: SEGAnerd776,Nintendo Switch ID: SW-1308-8511-0330. No chance. MvC2, Capcom vs SNK, Soul Calibur, etc. Ngl, the Dreamcast Gordon model is pretty cool aside from the bulge. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The Ps2 was BORING in every factor. People believed it. The vita was supposed to be similar to a ps3 but was very lackluster due to its timing of release. No, I think it looks like it has a lot more going on than the typical dreamcast game. I will always maintain that it was the Dreamcast, because it was the last console that had a heavy focus on replicating the arcade experience at home, with a lot of direct arcade ports, aided by the shared architecture between the Dreamcast and Sega's cabinets. net and head to half-life dreamcast. I was a PlayStation guy during the 32-bit era and I loved Ridge Racer to death in fact the PS1's crummy textures wrecking R4's gorgeous art was what made me jump on the Dreamcast as my first Sega console. Xbox was about 70% more powerful than GameCube. dreamcaast was a great console that High-end phones can even do games like Fortnite at 120hz, better than a Switch's 30fps. I do agree the hype of potential power helped kill the dreamcast. Massive catalog, everything sold more in that platform and is therefore more readily available but also the weakest of its generation the demand/price is lower for multiplats, lots of RPGs and action games, and is slightly more powerful than the Dreamcast. More complex and/or weird hardware systems (N64) are even more demanding. I haven't worked on GPU side a lot so there are some heavy glitches in some games. For Dreamcast, N64, PS1: The RP2S uses the T610 chip, which is good enough for those 3 systems. How powerful is the PS2? The PS2 has a clock rate of 294. Compared to the other Gen 6 consoles, going back and playing a PS2 definitely feels the most rough. Mar 15, 2020 · 9 Ninja Gaiden. Also, the PS2 didn't handle Anti-aliasing well at all. Sony Playstation 2 has great japanese exclusives in a larger amount than the others on the list. 2ghz can struggle running some PS2 titles. If you got a better view of the face I’m sure you’d reconsider that statement. PS2 - NetherSX or the older version of AetherSX2? And one that's not covered - CDI. KOF ‘98 and ‘99. I love the Dreamcast more but I think PS2 is the right answer. This is why me and others are now getting the feeling it's going to turn into another vapourware project. Is it possible to do the same process with Sega Naomi games? Jan 19, 2023 · I think Dreamcast definitely aged better when playing today, but 20 years ago I would have said PS2. OG Xbox had the most power, then Gamecube, PS2 and the earlier released Dreamcast the least. It has the most boring design I've ever seen in a console, looks like one of those chinese knock-off consoles and breaks really easily. 7" screen. Nobody knows why that is, maybe sony cheaped out on its video output. This is a factor that doesn't get called out enough. I finished resident evil code Veronica x on it at 1920x1440 resolution. Compare driver, cruisn USA and crazy taxi. 6. I've got a Steam Deck, but it's huge and just not something that can fit in my pocket. But, since the PS2 came out way early than Xbox and GameCube, it did have some much love and content. Nintendo GameCube. Any emulator is going to struggle to render at a slideshow speed. The Dreamcast port is widely regarded as the best version of the game. ) and had a 147. Secondly as you pointed out arcade ports on Dreamcast where many. I know most games won’t run perfectly but I’d still like to add them We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I always felt like Dreamcast was more powerful than PS2 , but it could have just been the difficulty curve in programming for PS2 vs Dreamcasts more traditional hardware. Jun 30, 2013 · Jun 30, 2013. I only have so much time for gaming so if I'm going to play something retro, I'd much prefer a number of a short, fun, unique experiences vs. AetherSX2 allows many games to be played portably for the first time, which makes the quantity of games playable portably significantly larger, even expanding considerably on genres such Besides that the Ps2 was the weakest of the big three of that gen and they still spanked everyone else. Thanks MegaVolt98. Dreamcast game design is far more like the game design of the Sega Saturn than the PS2. It was Sony and its bullshit marketing campaign for the PS2. Honestly the picture looks so much clearer in the Dreamcast version. Im not running hdmi-out as i want to strictly use my Odin as a handheld. Like I've preordered the Ayn Loki (similar to the Aya Neo) cuz it looks more pocketable than my Deck. That started right around the time the Dreamcast was available. The Dreamcast had weaker hardware than it's competitors. T. 3 gflops of power. Finally I decided to publish a new version of nullDC psp. 3. 2. The actual answer is that a system is exactly as powerful as its specs say, but only as powerful as it's programmed to be. Step 3 - put a more powerful system in there. The commercial “failure” (in relative terms, always) of the GameCube can be attributed to 3 things: Piracy is a concern yes but the major cause of death of the Dreamcast was Sony including DVD functionality built into the PS2. The fighting games across both systems were way better on the Dreamcast with more animation and faster loading times among the biggest benefits. There has long been an argument where the cutoff point is between 'retro' and 'modern' gaming. I remember even as a kid hearing rumors of the legendary playstation 2. Jojo’s Bizarre Adventure. With games like Crazy Taxi, Jet Set Radio, Shenmue, Seaman, and more Note: My WiFi doesn’t seem to work so I must do it via PC transfer/micro SD card. Being released two years early gave it a first to market advantage but all the consoles released afterwards were more powerful. It being more powerful was not a concern. So portable PS2. Sega chose to use a proprietary format for their discs(GD-ROM), instead of the DVDs that the Xbox and PS2 used. Persona 3 will work very well, but other ps2 games it really depends, god of war is out the window but kingdom hearts and other jrpgs will work Dreamcast, n64 saturn and psp are all 100% playable Vita emulation is barely even possible on androids and there is no way you are getting anything playable on the 3+. dreamcast had better AA but it was the short-jadedness of the critics that swayed fans away reminding them of the epic fail of the saturn. Microsoft had their fan base, Nintendo had their fan base, and even Sony had their fan base as well. The RG405M has a 4" 640x480 screen. Although, dreamcast gordon does look like he probably cant swim. The highest a PSP can emulate at a playable state is an N64, and even then, it's hit or miss PS2 has a much wider selection of exclusives that are more fun to go back to vs Xbox. But the average requirements of Dreamcast and PS2 are higher than the average requirements of PS and Saturn because they’re from a later generation which means emulating their architecture is more demanding. Virtua fighter 4 never came out on the dreamcast but the arcade version is infinitely better than the ps2 version in terms of texture quality. PS2 has great games library, good graphics, lots of third party and superior looking console. Compare the Xbox and Wii versions of Cars and Scarface, and the Xbox comes out on top. Reply reply The Xbox's power is more easily accessible. The home HW team they had during the Sega CD/32X/Saturn era was just fucking goofy. Can it run Dreamcast? The question everyone should be asking is, Is it worth the cost to run a Dreamcast core. The Sega used an FM synthesis chip that was in some ways more powerful than the more traditional synthesis capabilities of the SNES, and was rather cutting edge at the time of release. Device: redmi note 4, Snapdragon 625, 4gb ram. GameCube was indeed powerful in raw hardware performance, more powerful than the PS2, and had a couple games taking full advantage of it (like RE4). Unfortunately Sega is also to blame to some extent for publishing and allowing third party editors to release some half-baked ps1 era games by the truck load. The only problem I can see with this is that Nintendo are probably more focused on getting a there's no actual difference with dreamcast and ps2 in the graphics realm. 75, definitely more powerful than dreamcast but not as powerful as a ps2. I saw somewhere that the GPU of the original 3ds has about 3. The PS4 and Xbox one are just much more powerful, the upgraded consoles are way more powerful than the switch. Apr 19, 2019 · Their games are generally great, though, and it's fortunate that they're still making them at least. The Dreamcast was a great console with quality games but released earlier than the other sixth gen consoles and failed to hold on to market share against the PS2. They mostly only have first… That's a vast oversimplification. The Game cube and Xbox may have more power in cpu and gpu, but it all just depends on your fan base. They showed pre-rendered cutscenes, selling them as real time gameplay, saying the PS2 was extremely more powerful than the Dreamcast. Really the Saturn and the money they sunk into that made it so they really couldn't continue to promote and market the Dreamcast indefinitely l, especially if The PS2 and DC version uses the same model both for campaign and multiplayer. Then Sega decided to get creative. Considering most modern smartphones can run reicast at 60fps the Switch should be able to handle a custom made Dreamcast emulator no problem. Nintendo 64. I mean, just save some money or spend more for a more powerful device. It was essentially the middle ground between the PS2 and Xbox, but was limited by the GD-Roms (the small discs), which essentially only had about a quarter of the space that the other systems used. The Dreamcast has more vram than the PSP, or even a PS2. 5" 640x480 screen. Fighting games are no contest, for one thing. The PS2 wasn't an especially powerful console for its generation (both the GameCube and the OG Xbox beat it), but it was a very complex one. I’m a Crazy Taxi 3 man. . The Wii's advantage over the Gamecube is mostly in its widescreen ability and full DVD sized discs. And I can get indie games like Dead Cells and Slay the Spire. The Dreamcast had poor third party support. 1x-2x res ps2 looks pretty rough on the odin screen. The result was more apparent jaggies (though nowhere near as bad as PS2) but noticeably more detail. Step 2 - hollow out a PSP. However, the best graphics in that gen would be either on Xbox or GameCube. Ps2 still has its hiccups even on my powerful pc. Dream on bro. The sd ram was just as good at compression as the ps2 was. Yeah, I can get behind that. Nintendo's last powerful console to date. It is a more powerful console than ps2, why the frek it runs so good then while ps2 games cry on my phone! Games tested: dead or alive 2, soul calibre, crazy taxy and marvel vs capcom 2. In the case of Wrath of Cortex on GameCube though, the graphics were worse, and the framerate was horrible, while the PS2 version looked good and ran smooth. More Topics Animals and Pets Anime Art Cars and Motor Vehicles Crafts and DIY Culture, Race, and Ethnicity Ethics and Philosophy Fashion Food and Drink History Hobbies Law Learning and Education Military Movies Music Place Podcasts and Streamers Politics Programming Reading, Writing, and Literature Religion and Spirituality Science Tabletop Use that. The RG280V isn't powerful enough for those consoles. Okay so this probably isnt even possible but i just watched a video about Sonic Unleashed PS2 and well just made me think do Pramod is also playing the same game, gets upset when people ask valid questions. PSP is between a PS1 and PS2 in terms of power, I believe. r/explainlikeimfive Jun 22, 2024 · Yes, the Dreamcast is more powerful than the PS1/N64 but less powerful than the PS2/GC/Xbox. Dreamcast, I feel it had a better overall library if you don't drink the Nintendo koolaid. S. PS2 didn't sacrifice quality to push more polys, it had more horsepower under the hood. Nothing more. Worst part is that the DC - and very few people know this - was graphically more capable than the Ps2. The visual presentation was only half the glory, however. The PS2 had games that looked light years better than anything seen on dreamcast. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. Don’t even think of playing demanding Dreamcast games on an RK3326 device. Retroid is a bit better in this regard (at least you can play some PS2 qnd GameCube games with these, with the new rg353 line you can play the same games as the rg351 but people continue to recommend to buy these because they are "new", I don't get why). More Topics Animals and Pets Anime Art Cars and Motor Vehicles Crafts and DIY Culture, Race, and Ethnicity Ethics and Philosophy Fashion Food and Drink History Hobbies Law Learning and Education Military Movies Music Place Podcasts and Streamers Politics Programming Reading, Writing, and Literature Religion and Spirituality Science Tabletop Games That's why a lot of these machines can handle the Dreamcast more easily than the overly-complex Saturn, and why it took so long for Amiga emulation to become decent. Last Blade (although it didn’t get a US PS1 port) Capcom vs SNK. A couple of good driving games. Dramcast's RAM was 16 MB while the PS2's RAM was 32 MB. Is it pretty much the same for ODIN? The RG552 unfortunately, while a lot more expensive than the Retroid Pocket 2+, doesn’t really do as well on Dreamcast, on Sonic Adventure 2, i get major stutters, and the game doesn’t really perform at 60FPS. West Coast rapper Del the Funky Homosapien had just finished a gaming-tinged set at a I know it's been said a million times, but the games for Dreamcast were ahead of time. The GPU is more standard, and it's easier to get triangles drawn on it compared to the PS2's, where you have to go through five different custom hardware layers if you want a triangle (DMAC -> VIF -> VU -> GIF -> GS). 2 GFLOPS. And even the Sega Saturn dominated the Nintendo 64 in Japan. Truly an underrated game. Rayman 2 was apparently initially planned for the Dreamcast but ended up releasing on the N64. Dreamcast has better survival horror, better sports games, better RPG selection, etc. I've seen some videos on youtube for setting this up on PC RA and having to put the bios in a "SAME_CDI" folder. The switch can’t play many games like call of duty, assassins creed, red dead redemption 2, cyberpunk etc. Jun 30, 2013 · The Dreamcast GPU was the NEC PowerVR2 DC with 100 MHz clock rate while the PS2 had a Graphics Synthesizer ( another GPU made by Sony like the Emotion Engine. Apr 24, 2020 · While one can argue the PlayStation 2 had the best lineup of games for its generation, The Sega Dreamcast had the most unique. You're asking for the impossible. #64. OG Xbox has 720p HD output as well. Look it up. Not powerfull enough. Basically, the Wii was a successful version of the Gamecube with motion controls. GameCube was about 50% more powerful than PS2. First the dreamcast is not successful enough with sales and profitability, then they make the decision to not be a console company. Sega would have made it happen, cut back what needed cutting back. Plus the PS2 port had a year on the DC release. I would guess a different team was used for Dreamcast, though many argue 3DFX would have been a better choice than NEC PowerVR to this day. At the same time, Sony had the developers and the cash to support them where SEGA just didn't. Jan 29, 2022 · So, while a Dreamcast port of Madden NFL 2000 would likely have amounted to little more than a prettier version of the game that appeared on the PlayStation, with none of the gameplay enhancements introduced by NFL 2K, it could’ve been the killer app Sega desperately needed. " Dreamcast games are simplistic, arcadey, one dimensional, and don't have anywhere Dreamcast is easier to emulate than PS2. I agree its being overrated today. Comparison of Nintendo GameCube and Sega Dreamcast based on specifications, reviews and ratings. And now that the new consoles are coming soon, games are just not going to run on the switch without massive compromises. Jul 31, 2023 · Posted: Jul 31, 2023 7:00 am. Nah, I dont think adding pool floaties to the HEV suit was a necessary addition. The new 3ds is double that so around 6. Xbox has Halo 1 and 2, which are available on 360 and Xbox 1. Though I feel like Dreamcast definitely had more untapped power they developers never really got to use. Nail in the coffin: the DVD player is included. ninja gaiden original xbox. The 3DO was a quality machine with a number of great games, but was released too early before the other fifth generation consoles and failed to hold on to market share against the PS1. Step 1 - be Ben Heck. It was the weakest console of the sixth generation, it came out in 2000 and was outperformed even by the Dreamcast (which came out in 1998) but advertised as a console "as The ps2 was the weakest console in the 6th generation of consoles, being the Xbox the most powerful, followed by the GameCube, dreamcast and finally the ps2 The small cd was produced so they could evict piracy for it's first years The Dreamcast version was the first one I played (outside the arcade) and I sunk hours into it. Very impressive what developer could do on slightly less powerful machinery. It was September 10, 1999 – the day after the Sega Dreamcast’s US launch. When a PS2 can run a game even close to Infinity Blade 2, then we can talk. So technically, PS2 was weak compared to their competition. There's more I've definitely not mentioned and am unaware of that others could point out. However it has a small 3. (Dreamcast). Sony marketed the PS2 as a DVD player as well as a game machine and it sold gang busters. The dreamcast port didn't have multiplayer. Now almost every Dreamcast games boot (excluding the winCE ones). This guy is pumping out Atomiswave games faster than the development of ET for Atari. . The main problem though with that port is the game is really meant for multiplayer, but to do multiplayer on PSP you need 4 PSP systems and 4 copies of the game, compared to a single copy of the game and 4 controllers on Dreamcast (much cheaper / easier to setup). bakagir. PS2 is one of the best-selling consoles due to it's game catalogue. After that there are only a handful of exclusives that that I'm interested in, Stubbs and Panzer Dragoon Orta being the only ones that come to mind. Sega Dreamcast. Yet my Ryzen 4. then there's third party software support which by sony's deep pockets went to the ps2 side. The streets, the time limit symbol, the cars reflectiveness, the shadows, it all looks so nice in the DC version & while the PS2 version is okay, it doesn't compare. So I was just curious as I know the Dreamcast shares alot in common with the Sega Naomi and made bringing those games over to the Dreamcast easier…. Dreamcast has nothing. 456MHz clock rate. I’d even compare my vita to a PS1. The expansive worlds of PS2 games were an insane generational leap. I think if Sega somehow survived and released a new console, honestly, it would've likely been similar to the Xbox 360. In1998 the Japanese release of the Dreamcast was actually dahm near hyperrealism compared to the ps1 and n64. I feel like I’m explaining 1+1 here. Dreamcast - RA's Flycast or Redream? I love Redream on the PC. The only difference is they are awesome. I would imagine it could be possible as: The Wii had a Sega Genesis Virtual Console. Say even tough the Sega Naomi have a tad more power. Sega GT, Rent a hero look like garbage for instance. Also had bettee transfer speeds. Raju: My ranking for the sixth generation consoles: 1 - Sony Playstation 2 2 - Nintendo GameCube 3 - Sega Dreamcast 4 - Microsoft Xbox P. Not only did the Sega Dreamcast have a much better lineup of games than the Nintendo 64 (especially third party games- something the Nintendo 64 barely had any of), but the Xbox came a year before the GameCube, and the GameCube was more powerful specs-wise. 912 MHz (299 MHz on newer versions) and 6,000 MIPS, with a floating point performance of 6. The dreamcast was and is a highly overrated console as well. Looking at all of this, I'd say the PS2 is the stronger device. They developed 3 different versions of the game. From what I can tell the Dreamcast was at least somewhat successful, but Sega saw the writing on the wall with the PS2, and even thought the PS2 was going to be more powerful than it was. A polygon is a polygon. Both the Gamecube and PS2 had equally impressive looking games though, especially Silent Hill comes to my mind. Marvel vs Capcom. Legacy of Kain Soul Reaver is notably one of the best looking games on PS1 but the Dreamcast manages to improve even further on this with even more crisp character models and less fog. The PSP however cleans up nicely. The lag and bugs in the PS2 version of Grandia 2 had to do with porting issues, as the consoles had rather different architectures. Comon ps2 emu Dev guys you need to up your game. Sega would eventually release a VGA cable for the DC, and when plugged into a PC monitor or compatible HDTV, games that ran over 640x480 would run at their native resolution. Also the Gordon single-player player model is the same model file as the dead HEV suit survey team in xen, but alternate head displayed. Oh I remember. investing a lot of time into an old PS2 version or not. The framerate is a bit higher but the emulator works best on 2D games. So while the ps2 was more powerful and would have the more detailed games the dreamcast versions would've ran smoother. It's pretty cool that Atomiswave is practally an arcade Dreamcast. rw lm gm vz oj sn el cx of tq